New Life Games Tech Forums

General NLG Chat => Welcome wagon and General Chat (Off-Topic Post Welcome) => Topic started by: proten on October 03, 2013, 10:22:53 PM



Title: Help finding a replacement part
Post by: proten on October 03, 2013, 10:22:53 PM
I've replaced the BNC connector on my O scope and
 I broke a small ceramic capacitor.
It is marked (0.001 P), is this the same as a 0.001 uf ?
The Tektronix manual says that it is a adjust as needed
for calibration so no help there.


Title: Re: Help finding a replacement part
Post by: cowboygames on October 03, 2013, 10:31:30 PM
Wouldn't that be .001 picoferrad?


Title: Re: Help finding a replacement part
Post by: proten on October 03, 2013, 10:51:16 PM
not sure, I searched the 0.001 P and all that comes back is 0.001 uf .

Found lots of 0.001 M & Z, no P.


Title: Re: Help finding a replacement part
Post by: cowboygames on October 03, 2013, 11:12:12 PM
1 microfarad is 1,000,000 picoferads. If you google .001 picoferads there are a few listings. Mouser may have what you need or the people that made the scope


Title: Re: Help finding a replacement part
Post by: Foster on October 04, 2013, 05:37:26 AM
I think it is  0.001 uF with a tolerance code of P (+100%, -0%)

1 pF is the practical smallest capacitor made.
Any smaller and the circuit's parasitic (stray) capacitance would dominate the capacitor when value is below 1 pF.
   


Title: Re: Help finding a replacement part
Post by: Neonkiss on October 04, 2013, 08:49:48 AM
I think it is  0.001 uF with a tolerance code of P (+100%, -0%)

1 pF is the practical smallest capacitor made.
Any smaller and the circuit's parasitic (stray) capacitance would dominate the capacitor when value is below 1 pF.
  

 :212- :212-
Ya, .001pF is like .0000000001uF


Title: Re: Help finding a replacement part
Post by: proten on October 04, 2013, 10:17:44 AM
That's what I was thinking but I just wanted
a second opinion.


Title: Re: Help finding a replacement part
Post by: cowboygames on October 04, 2013, 02:00:52 PM
I'm sure Fosters right, but why would they print the cap with the tolerance and not the capacitance? :103- Tolerance is irrelevant information to print on the cap if you don't know the capacitance value I would think.

Ok, I reread his post, I get it now :30-