Title: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: a69mopar on June 02, 2009, 10:56:06 PM I just shopped some slant top S2000 machines, the bottles to catch the spills were almost filled with disgusting sediment, a little hot water ans they were clean. The attendants must not like to take the coins from these since one of them had about a dozen tokens in it. The machines turned out nice. They are Tabasco 3 coin, Triple Lucky Sevens and The Mummy. If you haven't heard The Mummy sound, it's better than Tabasco.
I used my Grandaughter's camera which the date is wrong in , but here are some pics. Thanks, Wayne Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: a69mopar on June 02, 2009, 11:01:36 PM two
Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: a69mopar on June 02, 2009, 11:02:23 PM last, I cropped the dates since it bugged me.
Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: tacman on June 02, 2009, 11:07:49 PM Wayne, they look good for slants. I sent you a PM with questions on the Mummy.
Dan (tacman) Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: a69mopar on June 02, 2009, 11:17:55 PM I have a shortage of WBA heads so these are Canadian Quarters only, but can cash out by ticket or the hopper, whatever the player decides, I love that option. I have three others to shop, well I already started, another Mummy, another Triple Lucky Sevens, and an American Beauty which is missing the simm, i think it's a 42 anyway.
Thanks, Wayne Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: Brianzz on June 02, 2009, 11:42:14 PM I like slant machines.. I understand I'm in the minority here.. but what can I say.. I like to lean while I play.
The Mummy is a fun machine if you've got the sound card in it. Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: a69mopar on June 03, 2009, 12:05:45 AM I love the sound on it, All of my slants have the correct sound simm, except American Beauty, which is missing the simm.
I don't see many posts on them so though I'd post . Thanks, Wayne Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: Thor777 on June 03, 2009, 12:59:05 AM I like slant machines.. I understand I'm in the minority here.. but what can I say.. I like to lean while I play. I wish I could have a slant machine for the collection :89- ...My problem is not so much the room but getting it home in a small car :37- I HAVE managed to get a S2000 round top home by removing the top and somewhat taking it apart :89- Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: Brianzz on June 03, 2009, 01:10:27 AM You'll have to invest in a pick up truck and a tarp and about a dozen friends to help move it.. 368 was the billed weight last time I had an S+ slant shipped.. ouch
Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: a69mopar on June 03, 2009, 01:27:13 AM 368?, either I'm stronger than I thought or they overcharged you. I have moved S-Plus slants up from my basement on a hand truck (dolly) by myself. They were heavy, but I would doubt 368lbs. Was it skidded? I just took a crated S-Plus round top to the shipping terminal and it weighed in at 296 pounds. The S2000 slants likely weigh that much, it was a struggle to take them up the concrete steps outside. My hand truck bent when they were unloaded from the truck, I had to weld reinforcements on it.
I like the padding on the S2000 slants, they have a softer feel than the S-Plus slants I've had in the past. Thanks, Wayne Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: a69mopar on June 03, 2009, 01:39:38 AM Holy cow, I checked the specs and you're correct, well it actually shows 370 pounds.
Thanks, Wayne Table 2-11 Physical Specifications – S-Plus Slant-Top Characteristic Specification Height 52.50” (133.4 cm) Base 28.00” (71.1 cm) With bill Width Top box 26.50” (67.3 cm) acceptor Base 23.25” (59.1 cm) Depth Maximum 33.25” (84.5 cm) Weight 370 lbs. (166.5 kg) Height 50.75” (128.9 cm) Base 28.00” (71.1 cm) Without bill Width Top box 26.50” (67.3 cm) acceptor Base 21.25” (54.0 cm) Depth Maximum 31.25” (79.4 cm) Weight 350 lbs. (157.5 kg) Height 53.00” (134.6 cm) Base 28.00” (71.1 cm) Width Top box 26.50” (67.3 cm) Twin top box Base 42.50” (108.0 cm) Depth Maximum 62.50” (158.8 cm) Weight 745 lbs. (335.3 kg) Maximum combustible material weight 10.71 lbs. (4.8 kg) Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: Brianzz on June 03, 2009, 01:51:19 AM Yeah evidently the S+ slant bottoms were built completely out of the heaviest material on earth, they're ridiculously heavy, but they will take a licking and keep on ticking. Maybe they had to offset the weight of an obese gambler pushing themselves off the stool using the arm rest?
I can't find anything on S2000 slants.. weird Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: Brianzz on June 03, 2009, 01:58:21 AM As astounding as it may sound, I found the S2000 specs on IGT's site.. weird, usually nothing of use at all there..
Arch-Top Height (without service light/candle) ......................61.75” (156.9 cm) Width ......................................................................28.00” (71.1 cm) Depth (base) ...........................................................23.25” (59.1 cm) Depth (maximum)...................................................33.25” (84.5 cm) Weight ....................................................................350 lbs (158.8 kg) Slant-Top Height .....................................................................57.00” (144.8 cm) Width ......................................................................28.00” (71.1 cm) Depth (base) ...........................................................23.25” (59.1 cm) Depth (maximum)...................................................33.25” (84.5 cm) Weight ....................................................................350 lbs (158.8 kg) Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: a69mopar on June 03, 2009, 02:04:31 AM I have them in the game promo literature.
Thanks, Wayne Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: CaptainHappy on June 03, 2009, 05:36:36 AM I like slant machines.. I understand I'm in the minority here.. but what can I say.. I like to lean while I play. The Mummy is a fun machine if you've got the sound card in it. I like slants as well, especially if I am playing Video Poker for about 10 hours!!!!! CaptainHappy :95- Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: tacman on June 03, 2009, 09:52:55 AM Hey Wayne, I was looking at the slants in your profile and noticed the stereo speakers are all open access to the speaker cones. I wonder why IGT would not protect those with a grate or screen. I mean liquid getting splashed on them or just someone putting a finger through them, seems kinda vulnerable.
Dan (tacman) Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: Frank A on June 18, 2009, 04:54:19 PM What additional sounds does the American Beauty make if you have the sound card ? IGT + has other sounds available too or is it only on the 2000 machines ? What is the difference or advantage of a 2000 machine vs an IGT + ?
Frank A Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: a69mopar on June 18, 2009, 10:41:57 PM American Beauty is an S-Plus game so I will put s generic sound simm in (42). The sound is richer than an S-Plus since it's in stereo and the bass adds a nice touch. I actually think the sound is better on an S2000 slant than on the upright, maybe it just seems that way since the games all have special sound simms (Triple Lucky Sevens, Tabasco and The Mummy).
Thanks, Wayne Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: a69mopar on June 18, 2009, 10:44:44 PM Hey Wayne, I was looking at the slants in your profile and noticed the stereo speakers are all open access to the speaker cones. I wonder why IGT would not protect those with a grate or screen. I mean liquid getting splashed on them or just someone putting a finger through them, seems kinda vulnerable. You should zoom in on the pics, they do have mesh grilles on them which shows in the post pics in this thread. As far as liquid, It can get in any machine.Dan (tacman) Thanks, Wayne Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: a69mopar on June 18, 2009, 10:47:32 PM A little update would be that I made all of these multi denomination $.01, $.05, $.25, $1. The coin acceptor takes quarters, so playing for pennies goes a long way.
Thanks, Wayne Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: stormrider on June 18, 2009, 11:19:24 PM American Beauty is an S-Plus game so I will put s generic sound simm in (42). The sound is richer than an S-Plus since it's in stereo and the bass adds a nice touch. I actually think the sound is better on an S2000 slant than on the upright, maybe it just seems that way since the games all have special sound simms (Triple Lucky Sevens, Tabasco and The Mummy). Thanks, Wayne I agree my S2000 slant has much better sound deep rich bass I guess do to the fact the bottom of the cab in a slant has more room to reflect the bass and when sitting down the speakers in the top are ear level great full stereo sound not to say the upright doesn't but the slant has it beat. Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: tacman on June 18, 2009, 11:51:45 PM Wayne, yeah I see that grating now. The graphics on that Mummy are great, like the bandage wrapped 7. Whats the audio like?
Dan (tacman) Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: a69mopar on June 19, 2009, 12:33:28 AM Sounds are awesome, it blew me away since I had no expectations for it. Once I get a bit more free time, I'll try to video it with the sounds. The attract sounds are great too.
Thanks, Wayne Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: stayouttadabunker on June 19, 2009, 12:49:33 AM Those slants look nice Wayne! :3- :3-
Must be a lot of soft rubber under the armrests... I'm going to get on of those someday...! :91- Title: Re: S2000 slant top machines. Post by: Bettor Slots on June 19, 2009, 01:46:19 AM That Mummy is one of my favorite S-2000's...very nice machine Wayne. The sound and play in the reels is really addictive.
I was recently up at Windsor and usually stick to the penny slots...but saw the Mummy there...said what the heck...$10 bucks max and I am gone..... and played for the first time. LOL... :25- ...well $40 later I was still found myself addicted to that game and if my wife was not there I have a feeling another 20 would have gone in. :97- |